نه سری پرشور که داستانسرای رسانه های اجتماعی باشم۰
و نه هنری قابل عرضه برای انگیزش دیگران۰
فقط قلمی در دست، سوالهایی بی پاسخ و امیدی به آینده ای بهتر برای ایران و ایرانی۰
از این روست که در این ده مقاله کوتاه به موضوعاتی خواهم پرداخت که از دید بسیاری بی معنی، بی ربط، بیجا و بی وقت است. ایران همچنان آبستن حوادث است و من در فکر دانشگاه رفتن چنین طفلی هستم که به دنیا خواهد آمد۰
اما ترسیم چنین دورنمایی لازم است. لازم است همین الان که گیسوان خود را می بریم، جلوی گلوله سینه سپر می کنیم، خطر اعتصاب را به جان می خریم و خون نوجوانان و جوانان را بر کف خیابان و در و دیوار می بینیم، بیندیشیم. نه تنها به احساس قوی و انگیزه ای که ما را به سمت شکستن این دیوار، این دیو و این اهریمن صفتان می کشاند، بلکه به آینده ای که در فراسوی این دیوار انتظار ما را می کشد. همین فکر، همین برنامه، همین دورنماست که به نهال مبارزه ما آب می رساند، نور می تاباند و محملی برای رشدش می شود۰
نکته بنیادی دیگر این است که عدم پرداخت به این بحثهای بنیادین بهای سنگینی در دراز مدت دارد. من تصور نمی کنم هیچ شهروندی علاقه داشته باشد در کشوری زندگی کند که هر ۴۰-۵۰ سال یک انقلاب را تجربه کند و گروههای مختلف آن قدر مطالبات پاسخ داده نشده و خشم فروخورده داشته باشند که چاره ای جز تغییر نظام برای احقاق حقوقشان نداشته باشند. یکی از مشکلات در انقلابهای معاصر ایران این بوده که در تعریف مفاهیم بنیادین اتفاق نظر وجود نداشته یا راه حلهای پیش پا گذاشته، همراه با نادیده انگاشتن حقوق اقشار قابل توجهی از جامعه بوده است. از این روست که باید هر چه زودتر وارد این مقولات شد و نقاط مشترک اساسی را از همان اول تبیین کرد۰
پاسخها و راه حلهای من نظر فقط یک فرد است. ولی همین نظرها وقتی در بحث دیالکتیک با سایر دیدگاهها قرار می گیرد به مرور شکل گرفته و به طرحی اولیه برای نقشه ای عظیم می تواند تبدیل شود. نقشی هم که به عنوان نگارنده این سطور برای خود قایلم بیشتر در طرح سوال، اولیت بندی مسایل کلیدی و مشارکت فعال در هسته فکری نظام آینده ایران است. فقط در حد یک شهروندی که می خواهد مسوولیت خود را در حد توان فکری خود ایفا نماید۰
در ۱۰ گفتار آینده اگر بتوانم سوالهایی مطرح کنم که اندیشه شما را به گونه ای بینگیزاند که حتا یک درصد در شکل گیری فردای بهتری برای ایران تاثیر داشته باشد، در این ماموریت شخصی در قبال وطنم و هم میهنانم احساس سربلندی خواهم کرد۰
How can we make sense of Iran’s crisis in September 2022? Is it a women’s rights movement? Is it a civil rights movement? Is it a prelude to a revolution to topple over the Islamic Republic? Is it an outcry to change an authoritarian supreme leader? Or something else?
To add to the complexity of the issues at hand, we are faced with a multitude of other questions? What is a favorable outcome? How can we help? Is it destined to die down in the absence of clear leadership? Could the regime’s iron feast and shutting down the Internet manage the situation?
Dwindling Diversity & Exclusionist Approach: First and foremost, the problem lies in a misguided intent of the Islamic Regime to create a homogeneous Shia society after the Revolution of 1979. That led to the prosecution, social exclusion and out-flux of Jewish, Christian, Baha’i, Assyrian, Zoroastrian, Sufist, and many Sunni Iranian who couldn’t see a viable future for their children under that regime. The same blade pointed at intellectuals, artists, authors, LGBTQi community and simply anyone who didn’t match the strict doctrine of the supreme leader and his successor.
On the other hand, women’s exclusion has had a very paradoxical story in Iran. In a country that 60% of their college graduate are women, when it comes to their dress code, freedom of choice and ability to hold high office and leadership roles, they are treated very poorly and sometimes with utmost disrespect and humiliation. The majority of women in Iran don’t believe in a strict Islamic dress code and the majority of men affiliated with them, i.e. their fathers, brothers, partners and sons support that view. Hence, it’s no wonder that a catastrophic event like Mahsa Amini’s death ignites the entire nation (and all those in exile) as almost every Iranian soul can identify with the pain of being humiliated, excluded, harassed and even persecuted because of their inherent and natural identities.
If there is any path out of this crisis for Iran, if anyone wants to wildly-imagine a bright future for this country? Well, such bright future cannot exist without addressing the huge value that our diversity has. It cannot exist without truly including diverse voices, regardless of their gender, religious backgrounds, neuro-diversity, ethnicity and sexual orientation. Obviously, freedom of dress code and relaxing the hijab rules can be regarded as a favorable short-term outcome, but without addressing the fundamental patriarchal systems that fuels gender inequalities in Iran and similar countries, we wouldn’t see true progress.
This short blog wouldn’t be complete without addressing the other two crisis-provoking forces in Iran. They are not directly linked to the current uprising, but they have been a cause for decline in the place of Iran as a nation in the world.
Isolationist Policy: In short, Iran is currently one of the few nations that had a 180 degree turn in its originally-outwardly policy toward the globe. We missed the boat when it came to globalization two decades ago and thanks to international sanctions, Iran’s economy and markets are mostly segregated from the rest of the world. Who is here to blame? Arguably, a “no-West-no-East” doctrine introduced in 1979. As if by severing relationships, economical and political, we are motivated to become self-reliant and independent. Little we knew that this isolation led Iran that had the potential of becoming a trillion dollar non-oil-dependent economy, into a dwarf economy struggling to make ends meet. More on that in other blogs…
Paranoia and Trust Issues: Iran had a very bitter-sweet (mostly bitter) relationships with its neighbors and allies. Our history is filled with stories of being brutally invaded from the East, West, North and South over and over again. The relationship with Western powers is mixed with being betrayed and exploited over the past two centuries. If Iran was a person, people would have said it “has trust issues”. It takes a long time to rebuild that trust and to allow ourselves to be open to new relationships, especially with the US and European nations. Our relationships with our neighbors is also filled with those bitter-sweet memories. Therefore, a nation-building exercise in Iran cannot be regarded as complete without addressing those critical relationships regionally and globally.
Let’s end this with answering some of the questions posed in the second paragraph:
What is a favorable outcome? Based on the above argument, abolishing the morality police is not a favorable long-term outcome. It’s the system that fuels patriarchy, discrimination, and injustice toward women. Anything short of a system change would not address the root cause of our crisis.
How can we help? Well, it depends where you are and who you are. I am personally a fan of non-violent action and civil disobedience. That’s what Iranian women and men have been doing for decades now and they are taking it to a different level. Just simple (and extremely brave) acts of disobedience such as partially or fully removing hijab shakes the oppressors foundations to the core. More than anything, it’s the persistence over time that catalyzes the change. The victory is not by outnumbering or out-gunning the oppressors. It’s by changing their minds and hearts so they would flip and come to your side.
Is it destined to die down in the absence of clear leadership? Not necessarily. In some cultures including Iran, there is a common belief that no movement can be victorious without leadership. That’s not true. There are a multitude of movements (civil or revolutionary) that the leadership emerged as the struggles advanced toward victory. And sometimes, a leader was elected after change happened.
Could the regime’s iron feast and shutting down the Internet manage the situation? Most likely yes but for short-term. The longer it takes, the less fearful people become. No system can suppress the majority of its people and survive long. That’s why there is so much hope, so much fresh air in this unique uprising of Iranians whose wishes are beautifully summarized in one of their key slogans: women, life and liberty.
A few days ago, I received a message from Peter Senge (the author of the Fifth Discipline and the founder of the Society for Organizational Learning) inviting me to reflect on a few question at a time that was marked by the end of a few-thousand-year-old calendar and the start of a new one. In particular, I was invited to think about the following questions:
What am I committed to transforming in myself?
What seeds do I, and we, want to plant and cultivate for the well being of people and all life on earth?
What is the story that will be told in 100 years about what was transformed in this new beginning?
I took all these three questions very seriously and thought about the following answers:
1. What am I committed to transforming in myself?
To be less conservative and more courageous when it comes to expressing the truth and implementing justice
To be more proactive in connecting with people
To have no fear of failure, being judged and criticized by others
2. What seeds do I, and we, want to plant and cultivate for the well being of people and all life on earth?
Thinkocrats, especially as it relates to politics, leadership, education and healthcare
3. What is the story that will be told in 100 years about what was transformed in this new beginning?
That a group of people in 2012-13 decided to think differently about how they wanted to lead their lives and suspended some of their assumptions about how the world runs. In business, the “growth model” was challenged and people started to realize that “sustainability” and “growth” contradict by nature and the growth MUST stop at certain point of any kind of life cycle (including businesses and nations). In politics, the notion of “policy following the voters” was also challenged as people started to realize that if policy would only follow the voters’ wishes, a regression to the mean would be inevitable and no visionary leadership can exist. In medicine, a movement for “open system” started, which resembles the open-source movement in computer software. This movement changed the patient-doctor dynamics forever and had a huge impact on global movement of medical talent, cost of healthcare and patient choice. Hundred years ago, people started to fundamentally reassess the direction of human civilization and conducted some critical course corrections along the way.
I would like to share a musical sketch that I composed a couple of days ago that expresses the hopes I have for the future and the uncertainties that are the integral parts of this exciting journey.